Submissions/"English Wikipedia is the most complete": a systemic bias, post colonial and diversity reflection
Appearance
This is a Completed submission for Wikimania 2017 ready to be reviewed by a member of the Programme Committee. |
- Submission no. 2035 Subject - C7
- Title of the submission
- "English Wikipedia is the most complete": a systemic bias, post colonial and diversity reflection
- Type of submission (lecture, panel, tutorial/workshop, roundtable discussion, lightning talk, poster, birds of a feather discussion)
- Lightning talk
- Author of the submission
- Iván Martínez
- Language of presentation
- Preferably Spanish, English.
- E-mail address
- ivanwikimedia.mx
- Username
- ProtoplasmaKid
- Country of origin
- Mexico
- Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.)
- Wikimedia Mexico
- Personal homepage or blog
- Abstract
- During seven years as a Wikipedia trainer I heard the same comment in at least one of two workshops or talks that I give in Spanish: "English Wikipedia is the most complete". Beside the obvious size comparison between English and Spanish Wikipedia, I want to do a reflection and start a discussion about our perception of "complete", find some possible reasons behind the perception considering systemic bias, lack of diversity (according to socio-economical conditions of editors around the world, Gender Gap and internet access) also local sources as a measure of completion. I will use an example to compare an English Wikipedia article considering their sources and point of view to a Spanish Wikipedia using local and physical sources to build a new article to demonstrate that the perception of "complete" are more about size than quality.
- What will attendees take away from this session? I want to raise the attention to our Wikipedia problems around systemic bias and lack of diversity of our movement and the need of take urgent actions around it.
- Theme of presentation
- WikiCulture & Community
- For workshops and discussions, what level is the intended audience?
- Length of session (if other than 25 minutes, specify how long)
- 10 minutes
- Will you attend Wikimania if your submission is not accepted?
- Maybe yes
- Slides or further information (optional)
- Special requests
- Is this Submission a Draft or Final?
This is a Completed submission for Wikimania 2017 ready to be reviewed by a member of the Programme Committee. |
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with a hash and four tildes. (# ~~~~).
- Wotancito (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Funcrunch (talk) 21:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ziko (talk) 13:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Seeeko (talk) 18:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Anasuyas (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- --Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Monikasj (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Luisalvaz (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Amir É. Aharoni (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nikikana (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Salvador alc (talk) 16:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Galio (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Mahadeva (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- GastelEtzwane (talk) 11:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Warko (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- RachelWex (talk) 21:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Missvain (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Banfield (talk) 14:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Mssemantics (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Raystorm (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Textaural (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Minh Nguyễn 💬 19:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)